HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of lodoxamide 0.1% ophthalmic solution and levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension in vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lodoxamide 0.1% ophthalmic solution with levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension, each given four times daily (QID) for three months to patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).
METHODS:
The study was conducted multinationally according to a triple-masked parallel design in 95 VKC patients, with assessments at baseline then monthly during the three months of treatment. The primary efficacy variables were a Physician's Clinical Judgement Scale and a Patient's Overall Judgement Scale of improvements from baseline. Signs and symptoms of VKC were also assessed.
RESULTS:
Both primary efficacy variables showed significantly greater overall improvement of VKC from baseline with lodoxamide than levocabastine. The superiority of lodoxamide was demonstrated by the Physician's Clinical Judgement Scale at months 2 and 3, with a trend, at month 1, and by the Patient's Overall Judgement Scale at months 1, 2 and 3. All signs and symptoms of VKC improved significantly from baseline at all time points, regardless of treatment (p<0.001). However, relative to levocabastine, conjunctival discharge, photophobia and lacrimation were significantly reduced by lodoxamide at months 1, 2 and 3, itching at months 2 and 3, and bulbar conjunctiva at month 3. The temporal improvement of superior tarsal papillae did not differ significantly between treatments. Both were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS:
Lodoxamide 0.1% and levocabastine 0.05% eye drops, instilled four times daily for three months, were effective, safe and well tolerated by patients with VKC, but lodoxamide was significantly superior to levocabastine.
AuthorsP Verin, R Allewaert, J C Joyaux, E Piozzi, J Koliopoulos, E Bloch-Michel, Lodoxamide Study Group
JournalEuropean journal of ophthalmology (Eur J Ophthalmol) 2001 Apr-Jun Vol. 11 Issue 2 Pg. 120-5 ISSN: 1120-6721 [Print] United States
PMID11456011 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Allergic Agents
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Piperidines
  • Suspensions
  • levocabastine
  • Oxamic Acid
  • lodoxamide ethyl
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anti-Allergic Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Conjunctiva (drug effects)
  • Conjunctivitis, Allergic (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Oxamic Acid (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Piperidines (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Safety
  • Suspensions
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: