HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Intramuscular ziprasidone compared with intramuscular haloperidol in the treatment of acute psychosis. Ziprasidone I.M. Study Group.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
This 7-day, randomized, open-label, multicenter, international study compared the efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular (i.m.) ziprasidone with haloperidol i.m. and the transition from i.m. to oral treatment in hospitalized patients with acute psychotic agitation (related to DSM-III-R diagnoses).
METHOD:
Patients received up to 3 days of flexible-dose ziprasidone i.m. (N = 90) or haloperidol i.m. (N = 42) followed by oral treatment to day 7. After an initial ziprasidone i.m. dose of 10 mg, subsequent i.m. doses of 5 to 20 mg could be given every 4 to 6 hours (maximum daily dose = 80 mg) if needed, followed by oral ziprasidone, 80-200 mg/day. Haloperidol i.m. doses of 2.5 to 10 mg were given on entry, followed by 2.5 to 10 mg i.m. every 4 to 6 hours (maximum daily dose = 40 mg) if needed, then by oral haloperidol, 10-80 mg/day.
RESULTS:
The mean reductions in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total, BPRS agitation items, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale scores were statistically significantly greater (p < .05, p < .01, and p < .01, respectively) after ziprasidone i.m. treatment compared with haloperidol i.m. treatment. Further reductions in these scores also occurred in both groups following transition to oral treatment. Ziprasidone was associated with a lower incidence of movement disorders and a reduced requirement for anticholinergic medication during both i.m. and oral treatment compared with haloperidol. Movement disorder scale scores improved with ziprasidone i.m. and oral treatment, but deteriorated with haloperidol. Other adverse events were rare with both treatments.
CONCLUSION:
Ziprasidone i.m. was significantly more effective in reducing the symptoms of acute psychosis and was better tolerated than haloperidol i.m., particularly in movement disorders. The transition from ziprasidone i.m. to oral ziprasidone was effective and well tolerated.
AuthorsS Brook, J V Lucey, K P Gunn
JournalThe Journal of clinical psychiatry (J Clin Psychiatry) Vol. 61 Issue 12 Pg. 933-41 (Dec 2000) ISSN: 0160-6689 [Print] United States
PMID11206599 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antipsychotic Agents
  • Piperazines
  • Thiazoles
  • ziprasidone
  • Haloperidol
Topics
  • Acute Disease
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antipsychotic Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (statistics & numerical data)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Haloperidol (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intramuscular
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Piperazines (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Psychotic Disorders (diagnosis, drug therapy, psychology)
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Thiazoles (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: