HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of ceftazidime continuous infusion vs intermittent bolus injection in septicaemic melioidosis.

AbstractAIMS:
Experimental studies have suggested that constant intravenous infusion would be preferable to conventional intermittent bolus administration of beta-lactam antibiotics for serious Gram-negative infections. Severe melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei infection) carries a mortality over 40% despite treatment with high dose ceftazidime. The aim of this study was to measure the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of continuous infusion of ceftazidime vs intermittent bolus dosing in septicaemic melioidosis.
METHODS:
Patients with suspected septicaemic melioidosis were randomised to receive ceftazidime 40 mg kg(-1) 8 hourly by bolus injection or 4 mg kg(-1) h(-1) by constant infusion following a 12 mg kg(-1) priming dose and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared.
RESULTS:
Of the 34 patients studied 16 (59%) died. Twenty patients had cultures positive for B. pseudomallei of whom 12 (60%) died. The median MIC90 of B. pseudomallei was 2 mg l(-1), giving a minimum target concentration (4*MIC) of 8 mg l(-1). The median (range) estimated total apparent volume of distribution, systemic clearance and terminal elimination half-lives of ceftazidime were 0.468 (0.241-0. 573) l kg(-1), 0.058 (0.005-0.159) l kg(-1) h(-1) and 7.74 (1.95-44.71) h, respectively. Clearance of ceftazidime and creatinine clearance were correlated closely (r = 0.71; P < 0.001) and there was no evidence of significant nonrenal clearance.
CONCLUSIONS:
Simulations based on these data and the ceftazidime sensitivity of the B. pseudomallei isolates indicated that administration by constant infusion would allow significant dose reduction and cost saving. With conventional 8 h intermittent dosing to patients with normal renal function, plasma ceftazidime concentrations could fall below the target concentration but this would be unlikely with a constant infusion. Correction for renal failure, which is common in patients with meliodosis is Clearance = k(*) creatinine clearance where k = 0.72. Calculation of a loading dose gives median (range) values of loading dose, DL of 18.7 mg kg(-1) (9.5-23) and infusion rate I = 3.5 mg k(-1) h(-1) (0.4-13) (which equals 84 mg kg(-1) day(-1)). A nomogram for adjustment in renal failure is given.
AuthorsB J Angus, M D Smith, Y Suputtamongkol, H Mattie, A L Walsh, V Wuthiekanun, W Chaowagul, N J White
JournalBritish journal of clinical pharmacology (Br J Clin Pharmacol) Vol. 50 Issue 2 Pg. 184-91 (Aug 2000) ISSN: 0306-5251 [Print] ENGLAND
PMID10930972 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Corrected and Republished Article, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Cephalosporins
  • Ceftazidime
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bacteremia (drug therapy, economics, metabolism)
  • Burkholderia pseudomallei (drug effects, metabolism)
  • Ceftazidime (administration & dosage, economics, pharmacokinetics)
  • Cephalosporins (administration & dosage, economics, pharmacokinetics)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Melioidosis (drug therapy, economics, metabolism)
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Biological
  • Statistics, Nonparametric

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password: