HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A randomized, double-masked trial of topical ketorolac versus artificial tears for treatment of viral conjunctivitis.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To determine if topical ketorolac 0.5% relieves the symptoms and signs of viral conjunctivitis better than artificial tears.
DESIGN:
Randomized, controlled trial.
PARTICIPANTS:
One hundred seventeen patients with a clinical diagnosis of viral conjunctivitis were randomized to the treatment group or control group.
METHODS:
Physicians and patients were masked to treatment. Patients in the treatment group received topical ketorolac 0.5% four times daily. Patients in the control group received artificial tears four times daily. Symptom and sign scores were recorded on the day of recruitment and at the time of a follow-up examination 3 to 4 days later.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Change in six symptoms of conjunctivitis (overall discomfort, itching, foreign body sensation, tearing, redness, and lid swelling) and four signs of conjunctivitis (conjunctival injection, conjunctival chemosis, conjunctival mucus, and lid edema). Adverse effects were also studied.
RESULTS:
A total of 105 patients returned for their 3- to 4-day follow-up. Both the artificial tear and ketorolac groups showed improvement in all symptom scores at their 3- to 4-day follow-up visit. There was no statistically significant difference between the change in symptom scores between the treatment group and control group in any symptom category except redness. Patients in the control group were more likely to report improvement in redness than those in the treatment group, P = 0.012. There was no statistically significant difference between the change in sign scores between the treatment and control groups. Ketorolac 0.5% was more likely to produce stinging than artificial tears, 59.2% versus 18.8%, P < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS:
Topical ketorolac 0.5% used four times daily is no better than artificial tears at relieving the symptoms or signs of viral conjunctivitis and produces more stinging than artificial tears.
AuthorsY Shiuey, B K Ambati, A P Adamis
JournalOphthalmology (Ophthalmology) Vol. 107 Issue 8 Pg. 1512-7 (Aug 2000) ISSN: 0161-6420 [Print] United States
PMID10919900 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Ketorolac
Topics
  • Administration, Topical
  • Adult
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Conjunctivitis, Viral (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ketorolac (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Ophthalmic Solutions (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: