HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomized trial of paclitaxel plus supportive care versus supportive care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
In phase II trials, paclitaxel has been shown to have antitumor activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the survival and quality-of-life (QOL) benefits of paclitaxel used as a single agent compared with supportive care alone have not been assessed in a randomized clinical trial.
METHODS:
A total of 157 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who had received no prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either best supportive care alone (78 patients) or paclitaxel plus supportive care (79 patients). Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Supportive care included palliative radiotherapy and supportive therapy with corticosteroids, antibiotics, analgesics, antiemetics, transfusions, and other symptomatic therapy as required. The primary end point of the study was survival. Time to disease progression, response rate, adverse events, and QOL were secondary end points.
RESULTS:
Pretreatment characteristics were evenly distributed between the two arms. Survival was statistically significantly better in the paclitaxel plus supportive care arm than in the supportive care alone arm (two-sided P =.037) (median survival = 6.8 months versus 4.8 months). Cox multivariate analysis showed paclitaxel plus supportive care to be statistically significantly associated with improved survival (two-sided P =.048). QOL was similar for both treatment arms, except for the functional activity score of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, where QOL data statistically significantly favored the paclitaxel plus supportive care arm (two-sided P =.043).
CONCLUSION:
The addition of paclitaxel to best supportive care significantly improved survival and time to disease progression compared with best supportive care in patients with advanced NSCLC and may improve some aspects of QOL.
AuthorsM Ranson, N Davidson, M Nicolson, S Falk, J Carmichael, P Lopez, H Anderson, N Gustafson, A Jeynes, G Gallant, T Washington, N Thatcher
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute (J Natl Cancer Inst) Vol. 92 Issue 13 Pg. 1074-80 (Jul 05 2000) ISSN: 0027-8874 [Print] United States
PMID10880550 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
  • Paclitaxel
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (drug therapy, pathology, therapy)
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms (drug therapy, pathology, therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Paclitaxel (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Quality of Life
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: