HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray versus loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: efficacy and quality of life.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The new aqueous formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) was compared with loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
OBJECTIVE:
The primary objective of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of TAA aqueous with loratadine in relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
METHODS:
A total of 351 patients were enrolled into this 4-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel group study. Patients received either TAA aqueous nasal spray (220 microg) or loratadine (10 mg) once daily. Efficacy variables were rhinitis symptom changes from baseline, physician global evaluations, and the patient dropout rate due to insufficient treatment effect. Safety and quality of life also was evaluated.
RESULTS:
Both TAA aqueous-treated and loratadine-treated patients had improvement in symptoms as early as day 1. Overall, TAA aqueous was significantly (P < .05) more effective than loratadine in reducing total nasal symptoms and individual symptoms of nasal congestion, nasal itch, and sneezing. Ocular symptoms improved from baseline in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups based on physician global evaluation. A similar number of patients in each group discontinued the study due to ineffective treatment. Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous patients maintained a significantly (P < .05) better quality of life in three of the dimensions (activity, nasal symptoms, and practical problems) and for overall quality of life. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in the incidence of adverse events, none of which were clinically significant.
CONCLUSIONS:
Both TAA aqueous and loratadine were effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous was significantly (P < .05) more effective than loratadine in controlling nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and maintaining a better quality of life for the patients.
AuthorsJ Condemi, R Schulz, J Lim
JournalAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology (Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol) Vol. 84 Issue 5 Pg. 533-8 (May 2000) ISSN: 1081-1206 [Print] United States
PMID10831008 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Allergic Agents
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Loratadine
  • Triamcinolone Acetonide
Topics
  • Administration, Intranasal
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Allergic Agents (pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use)
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal (administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Loratadine (pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life
  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal (drug therapy)
  • Therapeutic Equivalency
  • Triamcinolone Acetonide (administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: