HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Depressed in-patients respond differently to imipramine and mirtazapine.

Abstract
Tricyclic antidepressants and more recent antidepressants are generally considered to have equivalent efficacy in the treatment of depression. After a previous report of a marked difference in the response to mirtazapine compared to imipramine, we report here an analysis of different symptom clusters. One hundred seven consecutive in-patients with major depression (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III-R, DSM-III-R) and a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) score of 18 points or more were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment. Two and four weeks after predefined blood levels had been obtained, the severity of depression was assessed using the HRS-D. The mean dosages used were 235 mg/day of imipramine and 77 mg/day of mirtazapine, the latter being in excess of the 15-45 mg/day range currently advised. Total HRS-D scores and seven symptom clusters were analyzed in the 85 patients (79%) who were not receiving any co-medication. Imipramine was more effective against the clusters related to core symptoms of depression: "depression and guilt", "retardation", and "melancholia", respectively. Mirtazapine showed a biphasic response with regard to the clusters "sleep" and "anxiety/agitation", respectively, which consisted of a marked response after two weeks of predefined blood level, but with a waning of this effect at four weeks. Imipramine produced a more gradual response on these clusters, which was more pronounced at four weeks than with mirtazapine. Two aspects of the present study could be related to this finding: blood level control resulted in optimal treatment with imipramine but not mirtazapine, and - most importantly - the patients were not receiving any anxiolytic or hypnotic co-medication. These findings suggest that mirtazapine may have anxiolytic and sedative properties and fewer antidepressant properties than imipramine in severely depressed in-patients.
AuthorsJ A Bruijn, P Moleman, P G Mulder, W W van den Broek
JournalPharmacopsychiatry (Pharmacopsychiatry) Vol. 32 Issue 3 Pg. 87-92 (May 1999) ISSN: 0176-3679 [Print] Germany
PMID10463374 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists
  • Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic
  • Mianserin
  • Mirtazapine
  • Imipramine
Topics
  • Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists (therapeutic use)
  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic (therapeutic use)
  • Anxiety (complications, drug therapy)
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Depression (drug therapy)
  • Depressive Disorder (complications, drug therapy)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imipramine (therapeutic use)
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Male
  • Mianserin (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Middle Aged
  • Mirtazapine
  • Sleep Wake Disorders (complications, drug therapy)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: