Abstract | BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVE: METHODS: In a randomised, monocentric, double-blind, cross-over pilot study (n = 14), each formulation was administered for 8 weeks, followed by switching to the other treatment group for another 8 weeks. RESULTS: After 2 weeks of therapy, the improvement under Neoral therapy was significantly higher than with Sandimmun (disease activity p = 0.047; extent of disease p = 0.016). In contrast, after 8 weeks of therapy, both formulations yielded similar improvement in the patients' condition. CONCLUSION: While both formulations are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of severe AD, Neoral may have a faster onset of action and higher initial efficacy, which makes it an adequate replacement for Sandimmun.
|
Authors | B Zurbriggen, B Wüthrich, A B Cachelin, P B Wili, M K Kägi |
Journal | Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)
(Dermatology)
Vol. 198
Issue 1
Pg. 56-60
( 1999)
ISSN: 1018-8665 [Print] Switzerland |
PMID | 10026403
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Emulsions
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Cyclosporine
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Cross-Over Studies
- Cyclosporine
(administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Dermatitis, Atopic
(drug therapy)
- Double-Blind Method
- Emulsions
- Female
- Headache
(chemically induced)
- Humans
- Immunosuppressive Agents
(administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Nausea
(chemically induced)
- Pilot Projects
- Pruritus
(chemically induced)
- Severity of Illness Index
- Sleep Wake Disorders
(chemically induced)
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
|