|1.||Khatri, S G: 1 article (09/2015)|
|2.||Patil, S T: 1 article (09/2015)|
|3.||Samuel, S R: 1 article (09/2015)|
|4.||Acharya, S: 1 article (09/2015)|
|5.||Lopes, Anely Oliveira: 1 article (02/2015)|
|6.||Aranha, Ana Cecília Correa: 1 article (02/2015)|
|7.||Eduardo, Carlos de Paula: 1 article (02/2015)|
|8.||Khatri, Sachin G: 1 article (10/2014)|
|9.||Acharya, Shashidhar: 1 article (10/2014)|
|10.||Samuel, Srinivasan-Raj: 1 article (10/2014)|
12/01/1993 - "Both Gluma groups showed a highly significant reduction in sensitivity between baseline and postoperative pain scores (P < 0.05) and between the postoperative and the 1-week responses (P < 0.05). "
06/01/1999 - "Both Gluma Alternate and SMP showed significant reduction in sensitivity between pre- and postoperative pain scores (P < 0.05). "
06/01/2001 - "After removal of the smear layer the intracanal dentinal tubules of the specimens were acid-etched and treated with either Gluma or EBS. "
11/01/1998 - "Gluma CPS conditioner, applied for the recommended times, did not completely remove the smear layer. "
07/01/1989 - "SEM observations revealed that a 30-second application of Gluma Cleanser removes the smear layer totally. "
07/01/1989 - "From this in vitro study, it is concluded that total removal of the smear layer with opening of the dentinal tubules (e.g., by means of Gluma Cleanser) reduces the TBS of Gluma Dentin Bond-Lumifor restorations to ground root dentin."
03/01/2002 - "The cavities in the control group had an intact smear layer without a lining, while those in the experimental group were lined with Gluma CPS, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus or One-Step. "
04/01/2005 - "Coating with GLUMA desensitizing bonding system could prevent hypersensitivity of vital abutment."
04/01/2005 - "To evaluate the effects of GLUMA desensitizing bonding system in desensitizing hypersensitivity of vital abutment. "
01/01/1999 - "In cases, wherein Syntac and Gluma systems were applied, no post-procedural hypersensitivity was recorded. "
09/01/2015 - "A single topical application of ProArgin(™) paste is significantly more effective than both a single topical application of Gluma(®) and NovaMin(®) paste in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity immediately and over 30 days."
09/01/2015 - "ProArgin(™) paste elicited a significantly higher reduction in hypersensitivity (p < 0.016) compared to Gluma(®) and NovaMin(®) for all stimuli at the end of 30 days. "
10/01/2014 - "Key words:Dentine hypersensitivity, arginine, gluma, desensitizing agents."
11/01/2011 - "Gluma versus dentin bonding agents to treat dentin hypersensitivity (UT CAT #824)."
01/01/2011 - "However, Cervitec varnish is more efficacious in reducing dentine hypersensitivity than Gluma varnish at both 4 weeks and 12 weeks post-treatment."
01/01/2008 - "The reduction in dentin hypersensitivity at 24 hours (difference between baseline MPS and 24 hour MPS) was 5.28 for Gluma, 4.14 for iontophoresis, 3.28 for Duraphat, and 3.24 for CV which were all statistically significant (p<0.05). "
06/01/1999 - "At the end of the 6-month observation time, all teeth treated with Gluma Alternate, Gluma Desensitizer, and SMP showed no or very little dentin sensitivity."
|4.||Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate (Delton)